tele: 503.338.3808     email: cynthiaprice at aol.com
           endorsed by a broad and diverse group of citizens and by: AFSCME, Local 2746 and Crime Victims United, Oregon

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Last Night's Candidates' Forum

{Includes 9:42pm update.}

Attendance was a little low. I counted 25 who stayed to listen to the Commissioner candidates; about a third of the room left after the judicial candidates spoke.

The questions and answers were much better than at the previous forum. This is natural: as the campaigns continue, voters have more specific questions and candidates are more comfortable giving direct answers. John Yokum of the Seaside Signal was there and will do a good report.

My opening remarks were unscripted but went something like this:

I'm not sure how many of you know that the North Coast Republican Women joined forces early this year with a Republican State Senator, a Democratic State Representative and Crime Victims United President Steve Doell to petition the Oregon State Legislature to pass Jessica's Law, which provides for mandatory minimum sentences for child sex abusers as well as for better tracking of these predators.

These are not 18-year-olds who've had sex with their 15-year-old girlfriend-of-the day. These are 30-, 40-, 50-year-old deviants who have had sexual intercourse with a child under the age of 12 -- so, 8, 5, 18 months -- violent, horrible crimes that I have the luxury of holding my hands up to my ears and intoning "la-la-la-la-la" whenever reporting such events begins on the nightly news.

The effort of these Women and dozens of other groups across the state was so massively successful that Jessica's Law was passed within the first 57 minutes of the special session last week and has already been signed by Governor Kulongoski. It's good work and I'm very honored that Crime Victims United has endorsed my candidacy.

And so we can focus on one difference between me and my opponent. I have been and will be a strong and vocal proponent of public safety and of continuing to provide Clatsop County with the level of service it's come to expect. Some have tried to claim that my candidacy is all and only about propping up my husband's interests. I've been married to our District Attorney, Josh Marquis, for ten years and I have a enormous amount of respect for his advocacy and for the excellence he's attained in his field. But most of you might suspect that a woman who has the chutzpah to challenge a wealthy, land-owning, generational Astorian might have a few notions of her own.

Josh and I met when I was 41 and among some other core values, we shared an interest and a career in enforcement -- mine at the level of international sanctions and UN resolutions, his at ORS and federal statutes. We both believe that empty threats are just that: empty. Laws should either be enforced or we should seek openly to change them through the political process. They should not be skirted at the whim of a particular official on a pet occasion.

Today at the Budget Orientation session, the Jail Commander and the DA made compelling, resonable and credible presentations for additional staff. Their requests were less than half what was recommended by separate, independent studies of each department, studies that were commissioned by the BoC, cost some tens of thousands of dollars and that were paid for by you, the taxpayer. And at the end, the County Manager acknowledged the pressing need for the additional personnel but could not recommend them to the Budget Committee or the Commission. He said the expenditure of the additional dollars wouldn't fit within the policies set by the Long-Term Financial Plan. He asked what service -- what public safety service or DHS service or park maintenance -- would have to be cut to afford these new personnel. [See UPDATE below for later clarification.]

I ask: What about other areas of the budget? What about administration? What about the $800,000 that's budgeted for HVAC upgrades to the adminstration building?

What about the timber funds? Sure, the County must have a reasonable and prudent savings account, and as a general policy timber funds shouldn't be used for ongoing personnel and operational expenses. But the county won't turn to stone or go broke if we use some timber funds for those expenses. In fact, about half the timber funds ARE used for ongoing expenses, leaving $1.3 to $1.95 million or so in the savings account. We could take $250,000 from that account and fully fund those public safety requests.

Our choice: Ignore crimes or increase staff.

Here's another long-term vision. Clatsop County is going through a transition. A big part of that transition involves a heavy reliance on tourism. What is a tourist's biggest concern? Safety. Safe places to walk. Safe places to shop. Safe places to leave their luggage and their cars. Places that are safe from petty theft and vandalism. Our shopkeepers likewise depend on legal responses to deter petty theft, vandalism, and bad checks.

If we choose to be inflexible with our budget policies, we choose wrongly. I ask for your vote.
9:42pm UPDATE: The DA made his budget presentation to the full BoCC meeting this evening. Scott Derickson, the County Manager, recommended that the Board authorize the Budget Committee to consider the DA's request for two Deputy DA's and two Legal Assistants. After the meeting I asked Scott to clarify. He supports the request for the personnel because he is convinced of their need. Now it's up to the Budget Committee to figure out how to fund the positions, if they also agree to the need. And then Scott may or may not agree with the Budget Committee's recommended funding plan.

Stay tuned.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe the County needs safety!
How would adding more staff to the DA's office help?

4:54 PM  
Blogger cynthia said...

In January 2007, the DA's office will have to service a third judge. The DA's office can handle a 33 percent increase in court appearances by adding more deputy DA's and legal assistants to handle the casework and appear in court. Or it can ignore certain crimes. Stop processing "low-level" quality of life crimes: vandalism, petty theft (under $750), bad checks, criminal trespass, property hit and run. And, possibly, car theft, felony vandalism, possession of drugs, forgery.

9:32 PM  
Anonymous THartill said...

Any other major happenings at the meeting?
Don't take this the wrong way, but I hope you beleive that other issues that happen at the County are just as important as the ones that happen to the DA.

10:22 PM  
Blogger cynthia said...

Sure I do. I just happened to start out talking about public safety last night, because of the Jessica's Law connection and because the judges were there. And the only controversy in the '06-'07 budget is whether new positions will be funded in the Sheriff's and DA's office. More tomorrow. Hope you write something about the Energy Committee meeting.

10:30 PM  
Blogger jdoten said...

I believe that if the current staff worked a little harder, they could make up some of the difference and not need more staff. While I don't doubt that crimes (especially meth crimes) are on the rise, I doubt that some of the things that are being currently brought out by the DA, going back several years, need not be done and therefore would save money without additional staff.

7:29 AM  
Blogger Eugenics PI said...

THE INFLUENCE OF SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION AND NOTIFICATION LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES

CONTROLLING SEX OFFENDER REENTRY: JESSICA'S LAW MEASURES IN CALIFORNIA

Collateral Consequences of Sex Offender Registration

Please vist my blog for why this matters so much.

http://politicaleugenics.blogspot.com/

12:25 AM  
Blogger Eugenics PI said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

10:25 AM  
Blogger Eugenics PI said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

10:25 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

<< Home